Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2014 12:30:45 GMT -6
N.Korea is looking for trouble.
|
|
|
Post by samsara15 on Jul 28, 2014 20:49:05 GMT -6
A government of unpredictable madmen, in control of nuclear weapons.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2014 20:58:52 GMT -6
How do they intend to deliver these missiles to the White House and the Pentagon ? Carrier pigeon ? Kim Jun Un is a mini nut. The DNA in the Kim Jun family has some screws missing.. Is it time to send Rodman back for a chat ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2014 3:57:55 GMT -6
A threat is a threat and we should take it serious.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2014 13:44:57 GMT -6
A threat is a threat and we should take it serious. Kim Jun Il made the same threat. All credible sources say that NK does not have the capability for long range missiles. This same threat comes up from time to time I don't think that any N K nuke action could stand up against US missile defense. However neighboring countries could be at risk at some point.
|
|
|
Post by samsara15 on Jul 29, 2014 17:13:06 GMT -6
I once attended an after-dinner lecture by an expert on North Korea, a year or two ago. What we don't know about what happens inside North Korea is sobering.
But no one believes they can deliver long range missiles. Japan, on the other hand, has reason to be concerned.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2014 8:50:51 GMT -6
I once attended an after-dinner lecture by an expert on North Korea, a year or two ago. What we don't know about what happens inside North Korea is sobering. But no one believes they can deliver long range missiles. Japan, on the other hand, has reason to be concerned. It seems to me as long as someone has that intention that would be sobering in itself.
|
|
|
Post by samsara15 on Jul 31, 2014 18:44:00 GMT -6
It is. But we are, in spite of all our military might, not able to control the world. And if we did, or could, how moral would that be? Would we then have become tyrants ourselves? How long would it be before that same tyranny led to us controlling our own people, the same way? Some say we are already getting close to that stage.
|
|
|
Post by rdlb on Aug 3, 2014 10:01:28 GMT -6
It is. But we are, in spite of all our military might, not able to control the world. And if we did, or could, how moral would that be? Would we then have become tyrants ourselves? How long would it be before that same tyranny led to us controlling our own people, the same way? Some say we are already getting close to that stage. One of Einstein's friends Kurt Gödel decided to become a U.S. citizen in 1947. He took his preparation for the exam very seriously, studied the Constitution carefully, and (as might be expected by the formulator of the incompleteness theory) found what he believed was a logical flaw. "There was an internal inconsistency, he insisted, that could allow the entire government to degenerate into tyranny". During Gödel's visit to Trenton to take the citizenship test, the judge asked him about the Constitution. Gödel launched his proof that its internal inconsistency made a dictatorship possible.
Einstein, His Life and Universe Walter Isaacson pp. 510
How close we had came to that tyranny when one party had control over the house, senate and executive branch, forcing their will over the those they are supposed to serve. In N. Korea the people are forced to serve the state. Here the state is to serve the people.
|
|
|
Post by samsara15 on Feb 4, 2015 19:11:04 GMT -6
North Korea still threatens. By all we know, they are very far short of the ability to deliver on their threats, to any nation except Japan. If I were Japan, I would be nervous, with a maniac next door. If I were a North Korean, I would be trying to figure out how to get the maniacs out of the way before they brought disaster on all of North Korea. Far, far away, we have ISIL, or ISIS. Why is our world so insane?
|
|