|
Post by lowell on Jun 11, 2021 12:54:54 GMT -6
Anyone can see how deftly Heeeeey dodges the most important failings of the new Republicans, and Trump. I don't mind yielding the deciding vote in the Senate to a woman, but a lot of new Republicans did. Women are gaining ground in politics and in my opinion this will make for a kinder, gentler country. Heeeey fears that. Heeeey is not a woman and Heeeeey (like Heeeeey's boss, Putin) fears an America that gains the trust and admiration of the world. That will diminish the influence of Communism in emerging economies of less industrialized nations.
|
|
|
Post by lowell on Jun 11, 2021 12:59:24 GMT -6
Buddhism sees women as being kinder and gentler.
For example, here is parable from the Nirvana Sutra and comments by Chang-an. (I don't expect Heeeey to be able to read it or understand it, let alone agree with it)
'The Nirvana Sutra says: “It is like the case of a poor woman. She has no house to live in and no one to aid or protect her, and in addition she is beset by illness, hunger, and thirst; she wanders through various places, begging for a living. While staying at an inn, she gives birth to a baby, but the master of the inn drives her away. Though the baby has just been born, she takes it up in her arms and sets out, hoping to journey to another land. But along the way, she encounters fierce wind and rain, and she is troubled by cold and bitten by mosquitoes, gadflies, hornets, and poisonous insects. Coming at length to the Ganges River, she clasps her child in her arms and begins to cross it. Although the current is very swift, she will not let go of her child, and in the end both mother and child are drowned. But through the merit that the woman gained by her loving tenderness, she is reborn after her death in the Brahmā heaven. “Manjushrī, if there are good men who wish to defend the correct teaching, they should emulate this poor woman crossing the Ganges who sacrificed her life because of her love for her child. Good man, the bodhisattvas who guard the Law should behave in this way. They should not hesitate to give up their lives. Then, although they do not seek emancipation, emancipation will come of itself, just as the poor woman, though she did not seek to be reborn in the Brahmā heaven, was nevertheless reborn there.” The Great Teacher Chang-an interprets this story from the Nirvana Sutra in terms of the three obstacles. Observe how he does this. The fact that the woman is called “poor” indicates that the person does not have the treasure of the Law. The fact that she is identified as a woman indicates that the person has a measure of tenderness. The “inn” signifies an impure land. The child she bears is the heart that has faith in the Lotus Sutra, or the wisdom that perceives one’s inherent Buddha nature. Being driven out of the inn by its master signifies that the person is exiled. The fact that the baby has just been born means that very little time has passed since the person began to have faith in the Lotus Sutra. The fierce wind the woman encounters is the imperial decree sentencing the person to exile. The mosquitoes, gadflies, and other insects are the “many ignorant people who will curse and speak ill of” the votary of the Lotus Sutra. The fact that both mother and child are drowned indicates that, though in the end the person had his head cut off, he never renounced his faith in the Lotus Sutra. Being reborn in the Brahmā heaven means being reborn in the realm of Buddhahood.'
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2021 13:01:50 GMT -6
I don't have the time or give a s h i t enough to go digging into old posts. If you want to post what you saved, go right ahead. I know what I said is 100% fact. YOU brought up the race of illegals and accused me of being against illegal immigration because, to you, they were all brown. I kept pointing out to you that they were deported because they crossed the border illegally, not because of their skin color. You kept insisting it was due to racism, and that the only reason I was against them was because I was white and they were brown. Utter stupidity on your part. We are both against illegal immigration moron. You just can't get it through your thick head because you need me to be a racist, so you can appear less racist. Anybody who has been around these forums as long as we have knows that. The issue of race and skin color is irrelevant to me when it comes to immigration. Find someone else to compare yourself to or post proof of what you are saying. You are a baldfaced liar. You accused ME of being racist because you thought a Hispanic shouldn't be against other Hispanics, so I must be a racist. Then when you found out that I'm not as 'brown' as the illegal aliens you had in mind, you accused me of being against illegals because they were 'brown'. No matter how many times I told you they are being deported because they are crossing ILLEGALLY, and NOT because of their skin color, it wouldn't sink in that fat head of yours. You said I was racist against people whom I share the same heritage/ancestry with. How stupid is that? And to further prove that what I say is true, your dumb ass is STILL calling me a racist. Lol And the issue of race and color was VERY relevant to you on my other forum. And yes you DID post A LOT about in on the Shoutbox, liar!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2021 13:02:27 GMT -6
Buddhism sees women as being kinder and gentler. For example, here is parable from the Nirvana Sutra and comments by Chang-an. (I don't expect Heeeey to be able to read it or understand it, let alone agree with it) 'The Nirvana Sutra says: “It is like the case of a poor woman. She has no house to live in and no one to aid or protect her, and in addition she is beset by illness, hunger, and thirst; she wanders through various places, begging for a living. While staying at an inn, she gives birth to a baby, but the master of the inn drives her away. Though the baby has just been born, she takes it up in her arms and sets out, hoping to journey to another land. But along the way, she encounters fierce wind and rain, and she is troubled by cold and bitten by mosquitoes, gadflies, hornets, and poisonous insects. Coming at length to the Ganges River, she clasps her child in her arms and begins to cross it. Although the current is very swift, she will not let go of her child, and in the end both mother and child are drowned. But through the merit that the woman gained by her loving tenderness, she is reborn after her death in the Brahmā heaven. “Manjushrī, if there are good men who wish to defend the correct teaching, they should emulate this poor woman crossing the Ganges who sacrificed her life because of her love for her child. Good man, the bodhisattvas who guard the Law should behave in this way. They should not hesitate to give up their lives. Then, although they do not seek emancipation, emancipation will come of itself, just as the poor woman, though she did not seek to be reborn in the Brahmā heaven, was nevertheless reborn there.” The Great Teacher Chang-an interprets this story from the Nirvana Sutra in terms of the three obstacles. Observe how he does this. The fact that the woman is called “poor” indicates that the person does not have the treasure of the Law. The fact that she is identified as a woman indicates that the person has a measure of tenderness. The “inn” signifies an impure land. The child she bears is the heart that has faith in the Lotus Sutra, or the wisdom that perceives one’s inherent Buddha nature. Being driven out of the inn by its master signifies that the person is exiled. The fact that the baby has just been born means that very little time has passed since the person began to have faith in the Lotus Sutra. The fierce wind the woman encounters is the imperial decree sentencing the person to exile. The mosquitoes, gadflies, and other insects are the “many ignorant people who will curse and speak ill of” the votary of the Lotus Sutra. The fact that both mother and child are drowned indicates that, though in the end the person had his head cut off, he never renounced his faith in the Lotus Sutra. Being reborn in the Brahmā heaven means being reborn in the realm of Buddhahood.' No genuine Buddhist would want anything to do with you.
|
|
|
Post by James T. Kirk on Jun 11, 2021 13:04:12 GMT -6
We are both against illegal immigration moron. You just can't get it through your thick head because you need me to be a racist, so you can appear less racist. Anybody who has been around these forums as long as we have knows that. The issue of race and skin color is irrelevant to me when it comes to immigration. Find someone else to compare yourself to or post proof of what you are saying. You are a baldfaced liar. You accused ME of being racist because you thought a Hispanic shouldn't be against other Hispanics, so I must be a racist. Then when you found out that I'm not as 'brown' as the illegal aliens you had in mind, you accused me of being against illegals because they were 'brown'. No matter how many times I told you they are being deported because they are crossing ILLEGALLY, and NOT because of their skin color, it wouldn't sink in that fat head of yours. You said I was racist against people whom I share the same heritage/ancestry with. How stupid is that? And to further prove that what I say is true, your dumb ass is STILL calling me a racist. Lol And the issue of race and color was VERY relevant to you on my other forum. And yes you DID post A LOT about in on the Shoutbox, liar! I repeat, post links or quotes please. And I still call you a racist, because still believe you are a racist.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2021 13:05:36 GMT -6
You are a baldfaced liar. You accused ME of being racist because you thought a Hispanic shouldn't be against other Hispanics, so I must be a racist. Then when you found out that I'm not as 'brown' as the illegal aliens you had in mind, you accused me of being against illegals because they were 'brown'. No matter how many times I told you they are being deported because they are crossing ILLEGALLY, and NOT because of their skin color, it wouldn't sink in that fat head of yours. You said I was racist against people whom I share the same heritage/ancestry with. How stupid is that? And to further prove that what I say is true, your dumb ass is STILL calling me a racist. Lol And the issue of race and color was VERY relevant to you on my other forum. And yes you DID post A LOT about in on the Shoutbox, liar! I repeat, post links or quotes please. I repeat, I don't have the time nor do I give enough of a s h i t to remind you of what you said. I'm not here to prove anything to anybody. YOU know what you said.
|
|
|
Post by James T. Kirk on Jun 11, 2021 13:07:58 GMT -6
I repeat, post links or quotes please. I repeat, I don't have the time nor do I give enough of a s h i t to remind you of what you said. I'm not here to prove anything to anybody. YOU know what you said. If you don't give s h i t you wouldn't be here posting about it. I know what I said and what I didn't say. I showed you one example of what I said. You have showed me none. You just keep repeating the same lies hoping someone will believe you.
|
|
|
Post by James T. Kirk on Jun 11, 2021 13:30:46 GMT -6
Kirk, you are showing how stupid you are. Words mean nothing in a court of law. Threats, gaining personal information like you have is a form of black mail even extortion. I don't have time for your sorry ass, have fun. Words mean a great deal in a court of law when they are under oath or in an affidavit to obtain a search warrant or subpoena duces tecum. So do words in documents. Trust me, I have a little experience with words used in courts. I have asked nothing from Sydney or anyone else. I have made no threats other than to defend myself. Accusing someone of blackmail and extortion is a serious matter I don't take lightly. If you don't have time for my sorry ass, I expect you will leave my sorry ass alone.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2021 13:32:55 GMT -6
I repeat, I don't have the time nor do I give enough of a s h i t to remind you of what you said. I'm not here to prove anything to anybody. YOU know what you said. If you don't give s h i t you wouldn't be here posting about it. I know what I said and what I didn't say. I showed you one example of what I said. You have showed me none. You just keep repeating the same lies hoping someone will believe you. Here is a link to just ONE thread where you interrogated me about my skin color. It was in the Chatzy that you were calling me a racist against "brown people" -- your words. You're lucky all those comments in the Chatzy are gone. You kept asking and asking and asking and wouldn't let up until I told you what my skin color was. When I told you, then you started in on calling me a racist against the "brown" illegals. If you deny it, you are a liar. politicsforum.boards.net/thread/2317/believe-marriage?page=2Here it is: Mar 15, 2020 at 5:16am James T. Kirk said: Which box will you check? What do you look like? I suspect you will check white. There is also a Hispanic box, but on a separate page. I've already submitted mine. I "think" there was the option to select more than one option under race. Perhaps someone who hasn't submitted theirs yet can confirm that. It's much easier with it online. It took about five minutes. ----- Now watch you pull an excuse out of your ass.
|
|
|
Post by garak on Jun 11, 2021 13:43:25 GMT -6
If you don't give s h i t you wouldn't be here posting about it. I know what I said and what I didn't say. I showed you one example of what I said. You have showed me none. You just keep repeating the same lies hoping someone will believe you. Here is a link to just ONE thread where you interrogated me about my skin color. It was in the Chatzy that you were calling me a racist against "brown people" -- your words. You're lucky all those comments in the Chatzy are gone. You kept asking and asking and asking and wouldn't let up until I told you what my skin color was. When I told you, then you started in on calling me a racist against the "brown" illegals. If you deny it, you are a liar. politicsforum.boards.net/thread/2317/believe-marriage?page=2Here it is: Mar 15, 2020 at 5:16am James T. Kirk said: Which box will you check? What do you look like? I suspect you will check white. There is also a Hispanic box, but on a separate page. I've already submitted mine. I "think" there was the option to select more than one option under race. Perhaps someone who hasn't submitted theirs yet can confirm that. It's much easier with it online. It took about five minutes. ----- Now watch you pull an excuse out of your ass. Wow! What I read from the archives you posted is that Sydney was able to find a platter big enough to go hand you your double wide taco butt to you. Your so called proof exonerates Kirk and puts the blame squarely on you. What an imbecile.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2021 13:50:54 GMT -6
Here is a link to just ONE thread where you interrogated me about my skin color. It was in the Chatzy that you were calling me a racist against "brown people" -- your words. You're lucky all those comments in the Chatzy are gone. You kept asking and asking and asking and wouldn't let up until I told you what my skin color was. When I told you, then you started in on calling me a racist against the "brown" illegals. If you deny it, you are a liar. politicsforum.boards.net/thread/2317/believe-marriage?page=2Here it is: Mar 15, 2020 at 5:16am James T. Kirk said: Which box will you check? What do you look like? I suspect you will check white. There is also a Hispanic box, but on a separate page. I've already submitted mine. I "think" there was the option to select more than one option under race. Perhaps someone who hasn't submitted theirs yet can confirm that. It's much easier with it online. It took about five minutes. ----- Now watch you pull an excuse out of your ass. Wow! What I read from the archives you posted is that Sydney was able to find a platter big enough to go hand you your double wide taco butt to you. Your so called proof exonerates Kirk and puts the blame squarely on you. What an imbecile. It proves that by asking me what race I was, he made it about race. You're too stupid to understand that though.
|
|
|
Post by garak on Jun 11, 2021 13:56:06 GMT -6
Wow! What I read from the archives you posted is that Sydney was able to find a platter big enough to go hand you your double wide taco butt to you. Your so called proof exonerates Kirk and puts the blame squarely on you. What an imbecile. It proves that by asking me what race I was, he made it about race. You're too stupid to understand that though. No, you got your oversized, double wide smelly taco butt handed to you. You are the one who makes everything about race. That makes you the queen racist. Oh and tell your boyfriend that he should watch you wit sisters carefully.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2021 14:11:43 GMT -6
It proves that by asking me what race I was, he made it about race. You're too stupid to understand that though. No, you got your oversized, double wide smelly taco butt handed to you. You are the one who makes everything about race. That makes you the queen racist. Oh and tell your boyfriend that he should watch you wit sisters carefully. I handed both of you your lard asses on a platter. I PROVED that Kirk kept hounding me about what race I was. When he found out, he THEN accused me of being against illegals because they were "brown" and I wasn't. HE is the one who made it about race and I PROVED it. End of story. Bye you stupid bastard.
|
|
|
Post by James T. Kirk on Jun 11, 2021 14:18:25 GMT -6
If you don't give s h i t you wouldn't be here posting about it. I know what I said and what I didn't say. I showed you one example of what I said. You have showed me none. You just keep repeating the same lies hoping someone will believe you. Here is a link to just ONE thread where you interrogated me about my skin color. It was in the Chatzy that you were calling me a racist against "brown people" -- your words. You're lucky all those comments in the Chatzy are gone. You kept asking and asking and asking and wouldn't let up until I told you what my skin color was. When I told you, then you started in on calling me a racist against the "brown" illegals. If you deny it, you are a liar. politicsforum.boards.net/thread/2317/believe-marriage?page=2Here it is: Mar 15, 2020 at 5:16am James T. Kirk said: Which box will you check? What do you look like? I suspect you will check white. There is also a Hispanic box, but on a separate page. I've already submitted mine. I "think" there was the option to select more than one option under race. Perhaps someone who hasn't submitted theirs yet can confirm that. It's much easier with it online. It took about five minutes. ----- Now watch you pull an excuse out of your ass. Thank you. Now that wasn't so hard was it? I've never denied having a discussion about your skin tone. I've said you identified as white all along. You admitted you checked "white" on the Census form. Now, I invite you and anyone else here to read that entire thread and find anything I said about thinking all illegal immigrants are Mexicans, all Mexicans are illegals, all Mexicans are dark skinned, that I am in favor of people entering the country illegally or anything at all racist, as you keep saying. I've said I don't believe you are Hispanic, and I don't. The best part of that thread was when Sydney responded to you with... Even she thought you were biased. LOL. Recent evidence would indicate her contention she has a better memory than I is flawed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 11, 2021 14:31:44 GMT -6
Here is a link to just ONE thread where you interrogated me about my skin color. It was in the Chatzy that you were calling me a racist against "brown people" -- your words. You're lucky all those comments in the Chatzy are gone. You kept asking and asking and asking and wouldn't let up until I told you what my skin color was. When I told you, then you started in on calling me a racist against the "brown" illegals. If you deny it, you are a liar. politicsforum.boards.net/thread/2317/believe-marriage?page=2Here it is: Mar 15, 2020 at 5:16am James T. Kirk said: Which box will you check? What do you look like? I suspect you will check white. There is also a Hispanic box, but on a separate page. I've already submitted mine. I "think" there was the option to select more than one option under race. Perhaps someone who hasn't submitted theirs yet can confirm that. It's much easier with it online. It took about five minutes. ----- Now watch you pull an excuse out of your ass. Thank you. Now that wasn't so hard was it? I've never denied having a discussion about your skin tone. I've said you identified as white all along. You admitted you checked "white" on the Census form. Now, I invite you and anyone else here to read that entire thread and find anything I said about thinking all illegal immigrants are Mexicans, all Mexicans are illegals, all Mexicans are dark skinned, that I am in favor of people entering the country illegally or anything at all racist, as you keep saying. I've said I don't believe you are Hispanic, and I don't. The best part of that thread was when Sydney responded to you with... Even she thought you were biased. LOL. Recent evidence would indicate her contention she has a better memory than I is flawed. And now I would like you to prove where I ever "trashed Mexicans." You accused me of doing that too. If neither of you could tell the difference between "Mexican" and "illegal alien" that's not my problem.
|
|