|
Post by James T. Kirk on Jun 3, 2021 9:48:05 GMT -6
You listened to Sidney Powell and Rudy Ghouliani too, and believed them. How did that work out for you? Every court they tried to peddle their snake oil to including the most conservative Supreme Court in your lifetime agreed with me. Believe what you want, but I wouldn't send any checks to the plaintiff's legal fund if I were you. lol As I've been saying, I don't watch the news and haven't for nearly five years. I couldn't care less about all the histrionics over Trump. You don't know jack squat about the legal team that's going after China, so stop broadcasting your ignorance. So when you predicted Tramp would still be sworn in on January 20, 2021 after he got his ass kicked you were basing it on your own knowledge? That's even more priceless. What a moron. In what way are you eligible to join this suit? Post a copy of it so we can read it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2021 10:35:53 GMT -6
As I've been saying, I don't watch the news and haven't for nearly five years. I couldn't care less about all the histrionics over Trump. You don't know jack squat about the legal team that's going after China, so stop broadcasting your ignorance. So when you predicted Tramp would still be sworn in on January 20, 2021 after he got his ass kicked you were basing it on your own knowledge? That's even more priceless. What a moron. In what way are you eligible to join this suit? Post a copy of it so we can read join it. Fixed.
|
|
|
Post by James T. Kirk on Jun 3, 2021 12:08:53 GMT -6
So when you predicted Tramp would still be sworn in on January 20, 2021 after he got his ass kicked you were basing it on your own knowledge? That's even more priceless. What a moron. In what way are you eligible to join this suit? Post a copy of it so we can read join it. Fixed. Translation: "Kirk got me again. Now what do I do? I know, I'll just change what he said."
|
|
|
Post by James T. Kirk on Jun 3, 2021 12:15:31 GMT -6
I'll repeat the questions.
"In what way are you eligible to join this suit?"
and
"Post a copy of it so we can read it."
Anything less than an answer is proof you are lying out of your ass as usual.
|
|
|
Post by lowell on Jun 3, 2021 16:07:39 GMT -6
"Class-Action Lawsuits Carry Risks, Rewards" "by Darla Dernovsek / March 24th, 2003 Joining in a class-action lawsuit often seems like a no-risk way to share in the proceeds of legal action. But every lawsuit has an element of uncertainty and where there's a gamble, there's a risk. Potential participants in class-action lawsuits should understand the possibility of liabilities and losses before agreeing to partake in the benefits. " "You can be liable. In some class-action lawsuits, participants can be liable for settlement costs. This is uncommon, but it does occur. Make sure the materials you receive spell out your potential liability or consult an attorney. " resourcecenter.cuna.org/21410/article/333/html
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2021 16:50:47 GMT -6
"Class-Action Lawsuits Carry Risks, Rewards" "by Darla Dernovsek / March 24th, 2003 Joining in a class-action lawsuit often seems like a no-risk way to share in the proceeds of legal action. But every lawsuit has an element of uncertainty and where there's a gamble, there's a risk. Potential participants in class-action lawsuits should understand the possibility of liabilities and losses before agreeing to partake in the benefits. " "You can be liable. In some class-action lawsuits, participants can be liable for settlement costs. This is uncommon, but it does occur. Make sure the materials you receive spell out your potential liability or consult an attorney. " resourcecenter.cuna.org/21410/article/333/htmlNo, I won't be liable for anything per the law group's own disclosures. Lol
|
|
|
Post by James T. Kirk on Jun 3, 2021 17:16:32 GMT -6
"Class-Action Lawsuits Carry Risks, Rewards" "by Darla Dernovsek / March 24th, 2003 Joining in a class-action lawsuit often seems like a no-risk way to share in the proceeds of legal action. But every lawsuit has an element of uncertainty and where there's a gamble, there's a risk. Potential participants in class-action lawsuits should understand the possibility of liabilities and losses before agreeing to partake in the benefits. " "You can be liable. In some class-action lawsuits, participants can be liable for settlement costs. This is uncommon, but it does occur. Make sure the materials you receive spell out your potential liability or consult an attorney. " resourcecenter.cuna.org/21410/article/333/htmlNo, I won't be liable for anything per the law group's own disclosures. Lol You won't be liable because you aren't a party to anything. What are your damages?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2021 17:23:32 GMT -6
No, I won't be liable for anything per the law group's own disclosures. Lol You won't be liable because you aren't a party to anything. What are your damages? Everybody has suffered damages. If you had to self-isolate, wear a mask, be on lockdown, that is considered damages. Everyone's way of life was severely altered. The lawsuit is open to anybody who wants to be included. If I can find the email, I'll post it. They send me up to date emails on how the lawsuit is progressing. Here is the link: www.bermanlawgroup.com/practice-area/class-action/coronavirus-class-action
|
|
|
Post by James T. Kirk on Jun 3, 2021 18:14:20 GMT -6
You won't be liable because you aren't a party to anything. What are your damages? Everybody has suffered damages. If you had to self-isolate, wear a mask, be on lockdown, that is considered damages. Everyone's way of life was severely altered. The lawsuit is open to anybody who wants to be included. If I can find the email, I'll post it. They send me up to date emails on how the lawsuit is progressing. Here is the link: www.bermanlawgroup.com/practice-area/class-action/coronavirus-class-action "The Berman Law Group looks forward to fighting for the rights of people and businesses across Florida and the rest of the country, who are now becoming sick or caring for loved ones, dealing with financial calamity, and navigating this new world of panic and social distancing and isolation. If you have been diagnosed by a medical professional with Coronavirus (COVID-19) or, have been economically impacted by the Coronavirus, contact The Berman Law Group for more information"Which of these conditions applies to you? When was the last email update you got? The last update on their web page is over a year old. There could also be civil suits filed against the United States because its "leader" called the pandemic a hoax, downplayed its seriousness, set an example by not wearing a mask, held large spreader events where American citizens contracted the disease and spread it to others to the degree that over a half million Americans died. He blocked people coming from China but failed to stop the spread of the virus from Europe. The Berman Group should file an amended complaint to include the US government. It would increase the likelihood of a judgment and make for a larger pool of money. Plus the most damning proof is that a record number of voters ousted that so-called leader to the point he encouraged a mob of lawbreakers to take part in an insurrection to try and illegally stay in power. Don't make any large purchases in anticipation of a win. You'll be waiting a lot of years for a big disappointment.
|
|
|
Post by James T. Kirk on Jun 3, 2021 18:28:47 GMT -6
You'll get a kick out of this one Heeeeey www.bermanlawgroup.com/meet-our-teamCheck the guy on the bottom row of the Berman Law Group's Executive Leadership Team. lol. Maybe my idea of amending the complaint to sue the former president will get some traction with an advisor of his caliber on the leadership staff.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 3, 2021 18:39:54 GMT -6
You'll get a kick out of this one Heeeeey www.bermanlawgroup.com/meet-our-teamCheck the guy on the bottom row of the Berman Law Group's Executive Leadership Team. lol. Maybe my idea of amending the complaint to sue the former president will get some traction with an advisor of his caliber on the leadership staff.
|
|
|
Post by lowell on Jun 3, 2021 21:19:52 GMT -6
"Can plaintiffs from other countries hold China legally accountable for the coronavirus pandemic in their respective courts?"
Source ABAJournal
"The litigation has spurred a double-edged question: Do international coronavirus cases have any chance of success, and even if they do, are the courts the proper forum to resolve issues that impact United States foreign policy?"
"Sovereign immunity"
"The consensus among international law scholars and attorneys to both questions has been a resounding no. "
'Litigation against foreign nations in U.S. courts is expressly prohibited unless it fits within one of the narrowly drawn exceptions in the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. The statute was enacted in 1976 to clarify conflicting thoughts on proper use of the statute. The most commonly raised exceptions, which are alleged in several pending COVID-19 complaints against China, are misconduct in the United States by foreign nations involving commercial activity and noncommercial torts.
The pandemic suit filed in Texas by attorney Larry Klayman and his conservative nonprofit Freedom Watch also alleges China created the virus in a lab as a biological weapon, amounting to an act of international terrorism, another exception. FSIA was amended in 2016 to extend continuation of a long-standing suit, which is still pending, against the government of Saudi Arabia by families of victims of the 9/11 attacks.
Lea Brilmayer, a professor of international law at Yale Law School, says, “Courts want to be careful about weighing in on foreign policy. It’s a diplomatic issue. If you make a mistake in foreign policy, it’s very hard to correct. It’s not like making a mistake when you interpret a statute or an executive order. If courts interpret [sovereign immunity] the wrong way, Congress can step in and correct the problem. But if they make a mistake about foreign policy, it can cause a war.”
The Florida complaint also seeks redress for untested grounds on which to sue a foreign country—the odds of which rival the chance of winning the lottery. To prevail, Congress would need to amend the FSIA to add yet another exception: engaging in an “ultrahazardous activity” that caused damage in the United States.
Berman claims with regard to China’s conduct that strict liability may be imposed for China’s operation of bioweapons labs, including one near Wuhan’s Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, which is widely suspected to be the origin of the outbreak.
“The idea that China is responsible for the original outbreak ignores all the subsequent missteps that have allowed the pandemic to ravage the United States,” says former State Department lawyer Chimène Keitner, a professor of international law at the University of California’s Hastings College of the Law in San Francisco. “So unless the U.S. government is willing to abrogate its own sovereign immunity, I think it really misses the point to not allow full investigation and accounting of what various governments could and should have done differently.”
Tom Ginsburg, an international law professor at the University of Chicago Law School, considers the cases against China a misuse of tort law. “You’re having the foreign policy of the United States being dictated by a bunch of tort lawyers in Florida,” he says. “We have a State Department for a reason.” '
Berman and Berman would be more likely to prevail in a suit for compensation against those who joined their class action lawsuit.
Let's examine, shall we Heeey? what would happen if we go to war against China. It would be a nuclear war. Pakistan would join that war against the U.S. - and Russia would be more likely to back China. Make your plans for your next life now. Then see what you can do in this life to ensure your success in achieving that future life.
P.S. It looks like Kirk is correct. If the courts violate Sovereign Immunity of China, they open the gates to lawsuits against Trump and his regime.
|
|
|
Post by James T. Kirk on Jun 4, 2021 2:41:14 GMT -6
The fact of the matter is they can't win a judgement for what the Chinese might have done in China. The United States, under Tramp's watch, allowed travel to and from China to the US and travel to and from European countries, all the while telling our citizens the pandemic was a hoax created by liberals. Tramp's careless and selfish handling of the pandemic resulted in the deaths of over 500,000 Americans and caused damages (allegedly) to Heeeeey. In spite of these facts, Heeeeey supported Tramp and his failed re-election campaign. There is ample evidence of her support on this and other forums. Her enthusiastic support for Tramp, that continues today, would be sufficient evidence to dismiss her from this class action suit. For Heeeeey to withhold this exculpatory evidence from the defendant would be illegal. I suspect most, if not all of the plaintiffs, in this baseless suit are in the same leaky boat as Heeeeey.
|
|
|
Post by James T. Kirk on Jun 4, 2021 2:47:01 GMT -6
You'll get a kick out of this one Heeeeey www.bermanlawgroup.com/meet-our-teamCheck the guy on the bottom row of the Berman Law Group's Executive Leadership Team. lol. Maybe my idea of amending the complaint to sue the former president will get some traction with an advisor of his caliber on the leadership staff. I didn't expect you to care. I just think it's hilarious that you claim to be a plaintiff in a lawsuit filed by a law office where President Biden's brother is a member of the Executive Leadership Team. Ain't that a hoot? LOL. Please keep coming back. You make me laugh every time you show up.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2021 6:04:30 GMT -6
The fact of the matter is they can't win a judgement for what the Chinese might have done in China. The United States, under Tramp's watch, allowed travel to and from China to the US and travel to and from European countries, all the while telling our citizens the pandemic was a hoax created by liberals. Tramp's careless and selfish handling of the pandemic resulted in the deaths of over 500,000 Americans and caused damages (allegedly) to Heeeeey. In spite of these facts, Heeeeey supported Tramp and his failed re-election campaign. There is ample evidence of her support on this and other forums. Her enthusiastic support for Tramp, that continues today, would be sufficient evidence to dismiss her from this class action suit. For Heeeeey to withhold this exculpatory evidence from the defendant would be illegal. I suspect most, if not all of the plaintiffs, in this baseless suit are in the same leaky boat as Heeeeey. You are full of c r a p. The communist country you defend lied from the start and allowed infected people to leave the country and spread it all over the world. When Trump called for a travel ban to and from China, you Democrats threw a fit calling him a 'racist'. And your president Creep called it 'xenophobic'. Thank God Hillary or Obama weren't in office, or any Democrat. They would've encouraged travel from China to show how 'not racist' they are. Nancy Pelosi was in her liberal more poophole of San Francisco encouraging people to go to Chinatown. Not ONE DEMOCRAT was for a travel ban. If anything, Trump is being vindicated and it's Fauci's ass that's in trouble now. And the fact that the law firm has Biden's dopey-looking brother on staff as a mascot doesn't mean anything to me. Here's something to make you laugh some more:
|
|